Thursday, June 28, 2012

Sania Mirza, Feminism, Chauvinism, and CryBabism


Statutory Warning to the Male Readers : Please dont read this post just because the title involves Sania Mirza, all you MCPs will be disappointed because she is a feminist now and not an "object" of visual consumption anymore..

Statutory Warning to the Female Readers : Please read this , specially if you are the "feminist to the core" of Facebook or Twitter, the two most fertile grounds of budding feminism, you will get lot of material to comment, share, criticize and dislike - which will really furthur your cause-  and vent out your feministic wrath against the male dominated society.

The newspapers have been flush with  news about the internal squabbles, the confusion, the humdrum in the sending of the Indian Tennis team to the London Olympics. Amongst all of it a new messiah - though old Testament would disagree since according to it the Messiah has to be a male- has risen, the champion of saving the "Indian Womanhood from prosecution", our very own glamour doll - which she had happily accepted herself to be but not anymore -Sania Mirza. I was moved to tears to finally realize that yes the ideal of equality was soon to be realized because we have a "PowerPuff" girl (Indian Express called her so) amongst us now  and all we chauvinistic MojoJojos would be served what we deserved.

The blasphemy that happened was that  Mahesh Bhupati and Rohan Bopanna were partners in Doubles. Bhupati had committed to Bopanna. None of the two was ready to partner with Peas. So there was a "Big Deal" that Peas would partner with Sania in the Mixed doubles and Vishnu Vardhan in doubles. Sania Mirza displayed real team spirit declaring that she would perform her best whomever she is paired  with. However keeping  with her feminist fundamentals she spoke up against the "disgruntled stalwart", her partner to be  in the London Olympics and with whom - she in the previous sentence had declared - would be giving her best.

Ofcourse Peas should not retaliate, he should silently take the insult, because any retaliation would
come from his "male ego". It is a fact that bargaining for players and partners is a regular phenomenon, and the only event other than doubles where one can bargain is Mixed Doubles and definately a female had to be involved. So what ? For the sake of equality Peas should have treated the  female "differently" not just as a "player". We want equality then how can he treat the female as an Equal, so what if in the process he would have violated Plato who said "Equals are treated Equal" . And dare anybody equate this with the fear psychosis that is visible in minorities. This is just not that.

I must salute Ms. Mirza for this crusade against oppression by the males.  She has been a constant victim of the male-centric society. She has been made really beautiful along with being endowed with the skill of tennis. She has constantly been devoured on the screen by the male vultures oops! I mean viewers. Ofcourse this led to her becoming much more popular than she would have by the sole virtue of her game. But no body can imagine the agony that our "true feminist" must be going through while becoming brand ambassador, minting money, rising the popularity charts, participating in Wills India Fashion Weeks, Lakme India Fashion Weeks etc. My heart cries when I imagine how she must have felt being reduced to such an object of display. I can vouch for her that she must have wanted to protest just like now but it is the male society to blame which must have crushed her desire to rise against it.


Her feminism is also very patriotic. She is afterall an Indian Feminist. . The televison coverage around her wedding, it being made a national affair because she is a heartthrob of the "males" in India was silently borne by her. She wanted to be the ambassador of Indo-Pak unity, otherwise she would have definately protested against it. 


Ofcourse many fools like me used to believe that the current humdrum around  feminism is more of an identity crisis, that too mostly by people who cant even understand it, an effort to make their presence felt in a world dominated by men, an order that has existed in 99% of the society, an effort to blow the remaining 1% out of proportion.  


But I am enlightened now , I am happy to be born an age when stalwarts of women freedom like Sania Mirza walked the earth in flesh and blood. 


I have to end the article here because I need to go and wash my face which is all sticky due to all the tears of happiness  that have flown down while writing this article.


:)

6 comments:

  1. Nice kind words of wisdom u wrote my friend... :P
    But as they say there are three ways to look at a certain thing : your way.....my way....and the Right way....
    And as far as this whole feminism thing is concerned i guess a revolution is a struggle to death between the future and the past .....

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i really cant comment on Ms Mirza's allegations of chauvinism because i sincerely have no idea about what made her fell like this.

    Yes, i think she is overrated.But i don't agree that she has allowed herself to be seen as a glamarous "öbject" of display just because she so happens to participate in fashion shows or tv advertisements. many sportspeople male/female do that. we never accused Sachin of projecting himself as an object of display when he did a lot of ads. did we? so basically the choice of seeing someone as an object or a human lies in the eyes of the viewer. i can guarantee i have never seen anyone like this, no matter what they wore or said or whether they were good in their career or not.

    Also, you implied that feminism is a ""ïndentity crisis". this notion has no base. one of your article talks about casteism in Bollywood. perhaps then the so called "lower" castes suffer from identity crisis?no, they don't. and neither do women. since childhood till death they are subjected to all kinds of discrimination. but if they raise an agenda against it, u call it an identity crisis. i think, amit, its the opposite. people are getting aware of their identity and they no longer want to be subjugated to anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Amit Arora,

    So here it is, from a feminist but not from the 'fertile grounds of FB or Twitter' so commenting here will only further my cause in a very small way.
    What do you have against feminism? I ask because if i knew that i might not have to comment any further or on feminism, in general. Obviously, i ask because this piece shows not only ignorance but also poor analysis on the matter, in general and on feminism, in particular.
    So let me first start by citing a few statements made by Sania Mirza (which MIGHT have missed your attention, guessing again that you read the IE(as you quote from it) which only had excerpts from Sania's letter). She says,
    "I have been fortunate to achieve a career best singles ranking of 27 in the world that has been only bettered by Vijay Amritraj (16) and Ramesh Krishnan (23) even amongst the men in the modern era. I have a career best doubles ranking of 7 in the world, which only Leander Paes and Mahesh Bhupathi have bettered. I am the only Grand Slam champion from India apart from Mahesh and Leander. I believe I can expect a little more respect from the National Tennis Federation than what has been accorded to me even if they did not think it necessary to send me a simple congratulatory message after I had won my second Grand Slam title 3 weeks ago."
    As is self evident, Sania Mirza's achievements speak for themselves. Indeed, doesn't a person of her stature deserve the respect of being consulted by AITA before being promised to a "disgruntled stalwart"? And this is quite different from 'bargaining' because nowhere was Sania's choice even talked about in this entire brouhaha. If this had to do with the fact that her wild card entry was not confirmed, then AITA should have also desisted from making any statement concerning her. Not only is this an outburst by Sania against the current episode she highlights how discrimination and disrespect is systemic ("they did not think it necessary to send me a simple congratulatory message after I had won my second
    Grand Slam title 3 weeks ago."). If you don't already know about the condition of women's sports in our country, you would like to read a few statements by other talented women atheletes - http://www.firstpost.com/sports/jwala-backs-sanias-claim-on-male-chauvinism-359561.html,

    http://www.firstpost.com/living/sania-mirza-to-mary-kom-playing-ball-in-a-mans-world-358754.html,

    http://indiatribune.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7420:kabaddi-world-cup-champions-go-home-by-auto-rickshaw&catid=135:others&Itemid=502

    ReplyDelete
  5. Secondly, Sania never claimed to be a feminist ( we don't know if she is or not). It is a label u r associating with her though we do know that she is a bold, strong "21st century" woman who knows and speaks her mind and was once famously seen wearing a T- Shirt saying "Well behaved women rarely make history" (http://www.tribuneindia.com/2008/20080209/spr-trib.htm#1). And that is a matter of great joy for any feminist.

    Lastly, the mocking manner in which you seek to dismantle her claims to being an empowered woman who doesn't want to be treated disrespectfully by linking it up to her celebrity status betrays your lack of understanding of feminist concerns which are a site of vibrant and passionate debates and differences among feminists themselves. Considering the diversity of worlds that women inhabit, women live, dress, move, say and do things in different ways and constantly negotiate and rebel in different ways. Y do u think she was being 'objectified' when she did not think so herself? Reverse the gaze, It is she who is wielding agency here. the male vultures or whatever can devour her on screen as much as they like as long as she doesn't mind it. Does that take away her right to be treated equally in other spheres of life? Your argument is infact making dangerous connotations akin to say if Bipasha Basu does 'provocative' item songs it is only natural that she will be sexually harassed and shouldn't ask for equal or respectful treatment when she goes to a public place!
    There seem to be either some moral judgments or conceptual misunderstanding regarding feminism ( clearly, you need to read more than Harlambos to understand feminism in all its depth). There are several issues that can be brought to bear on this topic. Suffice to say(in a slightly theoretical tone) that patriarchy does treat women as objects of display (and exalts you especially if you conform to patriarchal notions of beauty and attractiveness) but even within this space women exercise agency and acquire a degree of power. For all we (bole to feminists) are concerned, Sunny Leone could be a feminist (if she so wished )!

    Viva La Feminista!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think both you "A mad Tea Party" and Garima Singh are missing what I am trying to say , or may be I am not able to get my point across.

    - I have nothing against genuine Feminism

    - I am against this selective application of feministic ideology when it suits your needs. I doubt if anny genuine feminist would play the victim card as per her convenience and happily accept the other way round when I suits you.

    - "A mad tea party" you have put a lot of words in my mouth which I did not intend to speak or mean eg : the Bipasha Basu example you gave .

    Would reply in detail on this later :)

    ReplyDelete